|
grammar |
essay |
95 |
96 |
99 |
100 |
Σmath |
COMET |
count |
1608 |
1608 |
1607 |
1607 |
1607 |
1607 |
1619 |
1624 |
min |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
max |
74 |
50 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
38 |
1179 |
range |
74 |
50 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
38 |
1175 |
mode |
32 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
550 |
median |
33 |
22 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
16 |
546 |
mean |
34.87 |
22.03 |
6.63 |
4.04 |
3.4 |
2.49 |
16.44 |
547.98 |
stdev |
14.37 |
12.23 |
2.29 |
2.23 |
2.2 |
1.47 |
6.4 |
227.93 |
cv |
0.41 |
0.55 |
0.34 |
0.55 |
0.65 |
0.59 |
0.39 |
0.42 |
Table 1: Basic statistics
Correlations |
grammar |
es |
95 |
96 |
99 |
100 |
Σmath |
z |
grammar |
1.00 |
0.69 |
0.50 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
0.28 |
0.62 |
0.85 |
essay |
0.69 |
1.00 |
0.49 |
0.52 |
0.45 |
0.28 |
0.58 |
0.93 |
Σmath |
0.62 |
0.58 |
0.78 |
0.85 |
0.80 |
0.56 |
1.00 |
0.79 |
Table 2: Correlations
State |
High School |
Non-admitted |
Certificate |
Associates |
Sum |
Percentage |
Chuuk |
Berea |
2 |
25 |
3 |
30 |
10% |
|
Chuuk Campus |
26 |
53 |
2 |
81 |
2% |
|
Chuuk High |
107 |
68 |
2 |
177 |
1% |
|
Faichuk |
16 |
3 |
|
19 |
0% |
|
Mizpah |
4 |
15 |
3 |
22 |
14% |
|
Nnukuno |
4 |
6 |
1 |
11 |
9% |
|
PLHA |
11 |
31 |
|
42 |
0% |
|
Saramen |
|
24 |
21 |
45 |
47% |
|
SDA |
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
20% |
|
South Namoneas |
13 |
27 |
|
40 |
0% |
|
Weno |
35 |
43 |
2 |
80 |
3% |
|
Xavier |
|
2 |
24 |
26 |
92% |
Kosrae |
Kosrae HS |
8 |
92 |
63 |
163 |
39% |
Pohnpei |
CCA |
|
|
12 |
12 |
100% |
|
Nanpei Memorial |
4 |
43 |
50 |
97 |
52% |
|
Ohwa Mission |
|
6 |
|
6 |
0% |
|
PICS |
14 |
241 |
97 |
352 |
28% |
|
Pohnlangas |
3 |
60 |
28 |
91 |
31% |
|
Pohnpei campus |
4 |
55 |
10 |
69 |
14% |
|
SDA |
|
3 |
24 |
27 |
89% |
Yap |
NICHS |
2 |
33 |
1 |
36 |
3% |
|
OIHS |
|
17 |
3 |
20 |
15% |
|
Yap Campus |
1 |
18 |
6 |
25 |
24% |
|
Yap High |
4 |
95 |
40 |
139 |
29% |
|
Yap SDA |
|
2 |
7 |
9 |
78% |
Total Result |
|
259 |
965 |
400 |
1624 |
25% |
Table 3: Admissions status
High School |
Mean |
High School |
Mean |
High School |
Mean |
CCA |
972 |
Yap Campus |
609 |
Berea |
489 |
Xavier |
964 |
Yap High |
604 |
Chuuk Campus |
382 |
SDA |
839 |
Pohnpei campus |
559 |
PLHA |
373 |
Yap SDA |
778 |
Overall |
548 |
South Namoneas |
367 |
Saramen |
692 |
Ohwa Mission |
525 |
Nnukuno |
363 |
Nanpei Memorial |
680 |
OIHS |
507 |
Weno |
349 |
Kosrae HS |
646 |
NICHS |
501 |
Chuuk High |
289 |
Pohnlangas |
634 |
Mizpah |
500 |
Faichuk |
231 |
PICS |
613 |
|
|
|
|
Table 4: High School COMET means
95 |
2005 |
4.00 |
2006 |
6.69 |
|
2007 |
6.63 |
|
2006 top 400 |
8.57 |
|
2007 top 400 |
8.22 |
|
96 |
2005 |
3.25 |
2006 |
3.69 |
|
2007 |
4.04 |
|
2006 top 400 |
5.74 |
|
2007 top 400 |
6.31 |
|
99 |
2005 |
3.08 |
2006 |
3.51 |
|
2007 |
3.40 |
|
2006 top 400 |
5.74 |
|
2007 top 400 |
5.45 |
|
100 |
2005 |
2.25 |
2006 |
2.43 |
|
2007 |
2.49 |
|
2006 top 400 |
3.27 |
|
2007 top 400 |
3.32 |
Table 5: Longitudinal math means
|
|
non-admit |
certificate |
associates |
Sum |
||||||||
State |
High School |
95 |
96 |
95 |
96 |
99 |
100 |
95 |
96 |
99 |
100 |
101 |
|
Chuuk |
Berea |
2 |
|
17 |
7 |
1 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
30 |
CSC |
26 |
|
48 |
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Chuuk High |
106 |
1 |
60 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Faichuk |
16 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Mizpah |
4 |
|
13 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
22 |
|
Nnukuno |
4 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
PLHA |
11 |
|
30 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Saramen |
|
|
20 |
3 |
1 |
|
7 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
|
45 |
|
Chuuk SDA |
1 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
South Namoneas |
13 |
|
24 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Weno |
35 |
|
41 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Xavier |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
26 |
|
Kosrae |
Kosrae HS |
8 |
|
65 |
23 |
4 |
|
18 |
14 |
13 |
8 |
10 |
163 |
Pohnpei |
CCA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
|
12 |
Nanpei Memorial |
4 |
|
8 |
32 |
3 |
|
1 |
19 |
25 |
3 |
2 |
97 |
|
Ohwa Mission |
|
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
PICS |
11 |
3 |
123 |
109 |
9 |
|
24 |
34 |
25 |
11 |
3 |
352 |
|
Pohnlangas |
2 |
1 |
16 |
39 |
5 |
|
1 |
8 |
16 |
2 |
1 |
91 |
|
Pohnpei campus |
4 |
|
29 |
21 |
5 |
|
3 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
69 |
|
Pohnpei SDA |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
|
27 |
|
Yap |
NICHS |
2 |
|
20 |
11 |
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
36 |
OIHS |
|
|
14 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
20 |
|
Yap Campus |
1 |
|
11 |
6 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Yap High |
4 |
|
53 |
37 |
5 |
|
18 |
11 |
10 |
1 |
|
139 |
|
Yap SDA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Sums |
|
254 |
5 |
612 |
313 |
39 |
1 |
105 |
120 |
112 |
44 |
19 |
1624 |
Table 6: Placement by high school and admissions status
|
2006 |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
||
State |
Associate |
RF |
Associate |
RF |
Pop 2000 |
Pop RF |
2006 Factor |
2007 factor |
Chuuk |
75 |
18% |
59 |
15% |
53595 |
50% |
0.35 |
0.30 |
Kosrae |
55 |
13% |
63 |
16% |
7686 |
7% |
1.81 |
2.29 |
Pohnpei |
225 |
53% |
221 |
55% |
34486 |
32% |
1.65 |
1.72 |
Yap |
67 |
16% |
57 |
14% |
11241 |
11% |
1.51 |
1.27 |
|
422 |
100% |
400 |
100% |
107008 |
100% |
|
|
Table 7: Diversity
High school |
n |
sx |
low |
high |
mean |
Calvary Christian Academy |
12 |
7.91 |
36.98 |
47.02 |
42 |
Upward Bound Kosrae |
14 |
4.82 |
38.36 |
43.92 |
41.14 |
Yap SDA |
9 |
6.31 |
35.6 |
45.29 |
40.44 |
Xavier |
26 |
7.34 |
37.3 |
43.23 |
40.27 |
KHS advanced section |
22 |
7.35 |
34.01 |
40.53 |
37.27 |
Pohnpei SDA |
27 |
6.76 |
34.55 |
39.89 |
37.22 |
Nanpei academic sections |
38 |
6.74 |
34.52 |
38.95 |
36.74 |
Upward Bound Pohnpei |
14 |
6.52 |
28.88 |
36.41 |
32.64 |
Upward Bound Yap |
14 |
10.49 |
24.94 |
37.06 |
31 |
Saramen Chuuk Academy |
45 |
7.26 |
26.51 |
30.87 |
28.69 |
Nanpei Memorial all sections |
97 |
12.34 |
25.27 |
30.24 |
27.75 |
Kosrae High School |
162 |
11.15 |
25.18 |
28.64 |
26.91 |
Madolehnihmw HS, Pohnlangas |
87 |
10.23 |
24.18 |
28.54 |
26.36 |
Yap State Campus |
25 |
6.98 |
23.28 |
29.04 |
26.16 |
PICS |
350 |
9.61 |
24.15 |
26.17 |
25.16 |
Yap HS |
139 |
9.68 |
22.23 |
25.48 |
23.86 |
Nanpei business sections |
23 |
7.31 |
20.58 |
26.9 |
23.74 |
Ohwa |
6 |
5.35 |
17.71 |
28.95 |
23.33 |
overall |
1608 |
12.23 |
21.44 |
22.63 |
22.03 |
Outer Island HS, Ulithi |
20 |
8.38 |
17.38 |
25.22 |
21.3 |
Mizpah |
21 |
9.81 |
16.58 |
25.51 |
21.05 |
Nanpei vocational sections |
36 |
13.88 |
16.14 |
25.53 |
20.83 |
Chuuk SDA |
5 |
10.26 |
8.06 |
33.54 |
20.8 |
Pohnpei State Campus |
69 |
10.92 |
17.83 |
23.07 |
20.45 |
Neighboring Islands Central Woleai |
36 |
7.36 |
17.09 |
22.07 |
19.58 |
Berea Christian Academy |
30 |
9.11 |
12.3 |
19.1 |
15.7 |
Weno HS |
75 |
11.22 |
12.23 |
17.39 |
14.81 |
Pentecostal Lighthouse |
42 |
7.48 |
12.36 |
17.02 |
14.69 |
Chuuk State Campus |
81 |
11.39 |
11.56 |
16.59 |
14.07 |
Southern Noumeneas HS |
40 |
9.61 |
10.98 |
17.12 |
14.05 |
Nukuno |
11 |
7.66 |
7.76 |
18.06 |
12.91 |
Chuuk High School |
174 |
9.63 |
8.52 |
11.41 |
9.97 |
Faichuk |
19 |
7.04 |
1.56 |
8.34 |
4.95 |
Table 8: 95% confidence interval for essay including subgroups
High Schools |
n |
sx |
low |
high |
mean |
Upward Bound Kosrae |
14 |
4.6 |
28.27 |
33.58 |
30.93 |
Kosrae HS advanced section |
22 |
5.41 |
26.97 |
31.76 |
29.36 |
Upward Bound Pohnpei |
14 |
4.55 |
25.3 |
30.55 |
27.93 |
Xavier |
26 |
5.45 |
24.14 |
28.55 |
26.35 |
Calvary Christian Academy |
12 |
4.17 |
22.85 |
28.15 |
25.5 |
Nanpei academic sections |
38 |
4.55 |
22.95 |
25.94 |
24.45 |
Pohnpei SDA |
27 |
5.72 |
21.7 |
26.23 |
23.96 |
Upward Bound Yap |
14 |
7.96 |
16.83 |
26.02 |
21.43 |
Nanpei Memorial all sections |
97 |
5.35 |
20.11 |
22.26 |
21.19 |
Nanpei business sections |
23 |
3.68 |
19.54 |
22.72 |
21.13 |
Madolehnihmw HS, Pohnlangas |
91 |
5.12 |
19.2 |
21.33 |
20.26 |
Saramen |
45 |
4.76 |
18.08 |
20.94 |
19.51 |
Kosrae High School |
163 |
7.33 |
18.19 |
20.46 |
19.33 |
PICS |
352 |
5.44 |
17.26 |
18.4 |
17.83 |
Nanpei vocation section |
36 |
4.78 |
16.16 |
19.39 |
17.78 |
Pohnpei State Campus |
69 |
4.57 |
16.41 |
18.61 |
17.51 |
Berea |
30 |
5.73 |
14.99 |
19.27 |
17.13 |
Yap High School |
139 |
4.79 |
15.61 |
17.22 |
16.42 |
Yap State Campus |
25 |
5.8 |
12.93 |
17.71 |
15.32 |
Outer Island HS |
20 |
4.95 |
12.88 |
17.52 |
15.2 |
Neighboring Islands Central HS Woleai |
36 |
5.48 |
12.89 |
16.61 |
14.75 |
Mizpah |
21 |
5.86 |
11.95 |
17.29 |
14.62 |
Chuuk SDA |
5 |
6.5 |
6.32 |
22.48 |
14.4 |
Ohwa |
6 |
3.72 |
9.43 |
17.24 |
13.33 |
Chuuk State Campus |
81 |
3.41 |
11.62 |
13.12 |
12.37 |
Southern Noumeneas |
40 |
3.86 |
10.84 |
13.31 |
12.08 |
Pentecostal Lighthouse |
42 |
3.05 |
10.79 |
12.69 |
11.74 |
Weno HS |
77 |
4.11 |
10.06 |
11.92 |
10.99 |
Chuuk HS |
176 |
3.96 |
10.33 |
11.5 |
10.91 |
Nukuno |
11 |
3.06 |
7.76 |
11.87 |
9.82 |
Faichuk |
19 |
3.5 |
7.63 |
11 |
9.32 |
Yap SDA |
9 |
1.05 |
7.3 |
8.92 |
8.11 |
Table 9: 95% confidence interval for math including subgroups
State |
High School |
Sxn |
TRIO |
MS 095 |
MS 096 |
MS 099 |
MS 100 |
MS 101 |
Sum |
Chuuk |
Berea Christian |
|
|
21 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
30 |
Chuuk State Campus |
|
|
74 |
7 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Chuuk High |
|
|
167 |
10 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Faichuk |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Mizpah |
|
|
18 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
22 |
|
Nnukuno |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Pentecostal LHA |
|
|
41 |
1 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Saramen Chuuk |
|
|
27 |
9 |
5 |
4 |
|
45 |
|
Chuuk SDA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
South Namoneas |
|
|
37 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
40 |
|
Weno |
|
|
77 |
3 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Xavier |
|
|
9 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
26 |
|
Kosrae |
Kosrae HS |
|
|
86 |
31 |
15 |
3 |
2 |
137 |
UB |
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
|||
Adv |
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
||
UB |
|
3 |
|
2 |
5 |
10 |
|||
Pohnpei |
Calvary Christian A |
|
|
1 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
|
12 |
Nanpei Memorial |
Voc |
|
8 |
24 |
3 |
|
1 |
36 |
|
Aca |
|
3 |
11 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
38 |
||
Bus |
|
2 |
16 |
5 |
|
|
23 |
||
Ohwa Mission |
|
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
PICS |
|
|
158 |
145 |
28 |
5 |
2 |
338 |
|
UB |
|
1 |
6 |
6 |
1 |
14 |
|||
Madolehnihmw HS |
|
|
19 |
48 |
21 |
2 |
1 |
91 |
|
Pohnpei State Camp |
|
|
36 |
27 |
6 |
|
|
69 |
|
Pohnpei SDA |
|
|
4 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
|
27 |
|
Yap |
NICHS, Woleai |
|
|
22 |
11 |
3 |
|
|
36 |
OIHS, Ulithi |
|
|
14 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
17 |
|
UB |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
|||
Yap State Campus |
|
|
17 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
25 |
|
Yap High School |
|
|
70 |
46 |
12 |
|
|
128 |
|
UB |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
11 |
|||
Yap SDA |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Total Result |
|
|
|
971 |
438 |
151 |
45 |
19 |
1624 |
|
COMET Sub-Test 3 (Writing) Analytic Scale [Essay rubric] |
|
Syntax |
5 |
Grammar and word order nearly perfect. |
4 |
Some errors of grammar or word order but communication not impaired. |
3 |
Errors of grammar or word order fairly frequent; occasional re-reading necessary for full comprehension. |
2 |
Errors of grammar or word order frequent; efforts of interpretation sometimes required on reader’s part. |
1 |
Errors of grammar or word order very frequent; reader often has to rely on own interpretation. |
0 |
Errors of grammar or word order so severe as to make comprehension virtually impossible. |
|
Vocabulary |
5 |
Wide and correctly used vocabulary. |
4 |
Occasionally uses inappropriate terms or relies on circumlocution; expression of ideas not impaired. |
3 |
Uses wrong or inappropriate words fairly frequently; expression of ideas may be limited because of inadequate vocabulary. |
2 |
Limited vocabulary and frequent errors clearly hinder expression of ideas. |
1 |
Vocabulary so limited and so frequently misused that reader must often rely on own interpretation. |
0 |
Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension virtually impossible. |
|
Organization |
5 |
Extremely well organized. |
4 |
Material fairly well organized; links could occasionally be clearer but communication not impaired. |
3 |
Some lack of organization; re-reading required for clarification of ideas. |
2 |
Little or no attempt at connectivity, though reader can deduce some organization. |
1 |
Individual ideas may be clear, but very difficult to deduce connection between them. |
0 |
Lack of organization so severe that communication is seriously impaired. |
|
Cohesion |
5 |
Strong cohesion with smooth transitions both within and between paragraphs. |
4 |
Occasional lack of consistency in choice of cohesive structures and vocabulary but overall ease of communication not impaired. |
3 |
‘Patchy’, with some cohesive structures or vocabulary items noticeably inappropriate to general style. |
2 |
Cohesive structures or vocabulary items sometimes not only inappropriate but also misused; little sense of ease of communication. |
1 |
Communication often impaired by completely inappropriate or misused cohesive structures or vocabulary items. |
0 |
A ‘hotchpotch’ of half-learned misused cohesive structures and vocabulary items rendering communication almost impossible. |
|
Content |
5 |
Full and complete answer, inclusive of all parts of the task. |
4 |
Relevant and adequate answer to the task set. |
3 |
For the most part answers the task set, though there may be some gaps or redundant information. |
2 |
Answer of limited relevance to the task set. Possibly major gaps in treatment of topic and/or pointless repetition. |
1 |
Answer bears little relation to the task set. |
0 |
No evidence of assigned task. (If it is obvious that the student wrote on an unrelated topic or did not understand the instructions, give zeroes in all areas.) |