Do NOT copy and paste this whole thing into your lab report. Rewrite your report in your own words!
This laboratory explores the concepts of momentum and conservation of momentum.
Terminology: Large,
shooter marbles are called taws. Small marbles are called ducks.
What do you call marbles? What do you call shooter and player
marbles? In this lab we will use only duck marbles.
Questions
What does momentum mean?
What does conservation of momentum mean?
Can we show that momentum is conserved in a simple systems?
Introduction
Existing theory
asserts that momentum is conserved. In the first part of this
two-part laboratory you will explore qualitatively the
conservation of momentum. In the second part you will calculate the
momentum before a collision and the momentum after a collision of a
duck marble and another duck marble. In the third part you will
repeat part two, but using a taw colliding with a duck.
In physics:
Momentum is the mass (grams) multiplied by the velocity (cm/s).
Conservation means "stays the same." Usually this means, "the momentum after an event is the same as the momentum before an event." For this lab the "event" is a collision between marbles.
Duck is the term for a small marble.
Equipment
marbles
rulers
stopwatch
wood block or other support
tape
Part One: Conservation of Marble Momentum: Rolling Ducks
In part one we explore a simple system. Five marbles sit touching each other on the flat portion of a marble track. The marble track is made of two plastic rulers with grooves to guide the marbles. One or more marbles are released from an elevated end of the track.
Procedure for part one
Release one marble. How many marbles are ejected ("kicked out") from the group?
Release two marbles. How many marbles are ejected from the group?
Repeat for three, four, five... marbles.
How is the number in related to the number out?
Release one marble from half-way up the ramp. Is the inbound marble fast or slow? Is the ejected marble fast or slow?
Send a marble in at high speed. Is the ejected marble fast or slow?
How is the speed (velocity) in related to the speed (velocity) out?
As you work on the above questions, experiment. Play with the marbles. How to the marbles know what to do? How does a marble know whether to go or to stay? How do the marbles count? Just how smart is a marble? Play gently – marbles can and do break – but do play.
Data tables [d] [t] | Data Analysis and Results | Data Display/Diagrams
Design your own. You decide how to best record and present the data you have gathered.
Part Two: Conservation of momentum in a duck-duck collision
The momentum p is
defined as the mass multiplied by the velocity (speed). Both momentum
and velocity have directions associated with them, both are vector
quantities. This means they are usually written with an arrow on top
of the symbol for them. Marbles have a mass, their velocity is a
speed in a particular direction. The tracks keep the marbles moving
in the same single direction. In the world of science this is a
one-dimensional model and keeps the mathematics simpler.
Part two introduction
Momentum is said to be conserved. This means that the momentum before an event
should be equal to the momentum after an event.
In part two the event is a collision between two marbles. One marble at rest is hit by another marble rolling down the rample. The momentum of the one duck rolling down the ramp before the collision should be equal to the sum of the momentums of the ducks after the collision.
The duck marble coming into the collision is called the "inbound" duck in this laboratory. To keep the marbles straight, this lab will refer to the inbound marble as the blue duck marble and the marble that is sitting still on the track at the start as the white duck marble. Your marbles may be different in color!
Said "mathematically," the momentum before is equal to the sum of the momentums after is written:
The blue duck has a mass
mblue (m1) and the white duck that is hit on the track is mass mwhite (m2) in the formula
above.
In part two we measure all of the variables above and then plug the values into the equation above. If the left side is equal to the right side, momentum is conserved. If the left and right side are within 10% of each other, then the agreement is good enough. If the left side and right side are within 10% of each other, then we cannot say momentum is not conserved (watch the double negative!).
Procedure | Data tables | Data Analysis and Results [d] [t]
Overview
Find the mass of both of the ducks. Use two ducks close to the same mass if possible.
Rolling only one duck, the "inbound" m1 duck, measure the speed of the duck with the track empty. This is the velocity (speed) before the collision. Remember, the other duck is sitting still on the track with a velocity of zero centimeters per second.
Roll the one duck from the same spot so it collides with the second duck on the flat section of the track. Measure the speeds of each of the ducks after the collision.
Use the values obtained to plug into the equation above and determine if momentum before is the same as momentum after.
Details
The mass is measured using a balance beam scale.
To measure the speed accurately, we will roll the marble five times measuring the length of time for the marble to roll across the 30 cm flat section of track on the "second" ruler. This means measuring five time durations before the collision, and ten measurements for the durations after the collision.
Inbound marble speed measurement procedure
Roll the inbound blue duck down the track by itself, releasing the duck from 0.0 cm at the
top of the ramp track.
Measure the time for the blue duck to cover the 30.0 cm along the flat ruler. The two marbles below show the distance over which the measure the time for the blue duck.
Repeat this five times to get the average time for the blue duck prior to being involved in the collision.
We measure the speed on the flat section. The the slope the marble is accelerating. We only want to know the speed of the marble at the bottom of the slope. The speed at the bottom of the slope is the speed at which the blue marble will collide with the white marble.
To reduce the error, take five time measurements and use the average time. Instructional note: lower blocks yield slower marbles which improve velocity measurements.
Time blue duck before collision (s)
Mean time t1 from table above: _________________
The speed of the blue marble is calculated from velocity = distance ÷ duration. For the above set-up, the calculation is velocity v = 30 cm ÷ mean time t1
Calculate the momentum of the inbound blue duck.
Table 1: Momentum before collision
mass m1 blue duck (g)
distance for blue duck(cm)
mean time for blue duck (s)
velocity v1 blue duck (cm/s)
momentum blue duck (g cm/s) (mass × velocity)
÷
=
Outbound marble speeds measurement procedure
Now set up the ducks to collide.
Post-collision procedure
Place the blue m1 duck at 0.0 cm on the ramp track.
Place the white m2 duck on the flat track at 0.0 cm.
In the image above m1 is on the right, m2 is on the left.
Run the collision. Both marbles will roll off the track.
Speed of the white m2 marble after collision: Rerun the collision timing the duration (time) for the white marble to travel 30 cm. Repeat the collision four more times, measuring the duration for the white marble to travel 30 cm to the end of the track.
Speed of the blue m1 marble after collision: Rerun the collision timing the duration (time) for the BLUE marble to travel 10 cm. Repeat the collision four more times, measuring the duration for the blue marble to travel 10 cm to the end of the track. The shorter distance is due to the slow speed of the blue marble after the collision.
The above will require making five time measurements of the blue and five of the white duck. Use these measurements to determine the mean time for each. The tables below provide a place to record data.
Time blue duck after collision (s)
Mean time t2 from table above: _________________
Time white duck after collision(s)
Mean time t3 from table above: _________________
Table 2: Momentum after collision
mass m1 blue duck (g)
distance for m1 blue duck
mean time t2 for m1 blue duck after (s)
velocity m1 blue duck after (cm/s)
momentum m1 blue duck after (g cm/s)
mass m2 white duck (g)
distance for m2 white duck after
mean time t3 for m2 white duck after (s)
velocity m2 White duck after (cm/s)
momentum m2 white duck after (g cm/s)
sum of the momentums after:
Is the momentum of the
inbound m1 duck equal to the sum of the momentums of the two ducks
after the collision? How close are the results? Use the percentage
change formula to determine the change in momentum:
If the percentage change is less than 10%, then based on our very basic
experiment we cannot rule out conservation of linear momentum.
The momentum after is
not usually exactly equal to the momentum before. Was momentum gained
or lost from before to after? Why do you think this happened?
Data Display | Diagrams
Optional and up to the student.
Analysis [a]
What did you find – was momentum conserved?
What is the percentage gain or loss in momentum?
Where is the momentum coming from or going to– if anywhere?
Using (momentum after − momentum before)/momentum before, is your result within the 10% uncertainty before we tend to expect in our laboratory measurements?
Conclusions [c]
Wrap up these two activities with an essay that addresses each of the two activities
and the results you observed and measured.
Comment on whether the hypotheses held for your team. Was momentum conserved in parts one and two?
If momentum was lost or gained, why might it have been lost or gained?
How large, on a percentage basis, was the gain or loss?
Discuss anything unusual, new, ordifferent you encountered.
Discuss what the conservation of momentum and energy means for you in light of the above activities.
Be thorough and complete. Use correct grammar and spelling.
[Notes from the
field for instructors: In this laboratory we explore conservation of
linear momentum. Another momentum that is conserved is angular
momentum. Angular momentum is the momentum of spinning. Spinning
objects tend to continue to spin. Objects that are not spinning tend
to remain at rest– to not spin. Think of a child's toy top.
In the experiments above we considered only linear momentum, but the
marbles are spinning as they move on the track. In part two a
spinning m1 duck hits a non-spinning m2 duck. The m1 duck loses
speed and thus spin, the m2 duck goes from not spinning (sitting
still on the track) to spinning very quickly. These changes in spin
momentum are related to why linear momentum is consistently "lost"
in these collisions.
Where linear
momentum is p = mv, the angular momentum L = Iω where I =
0.4mr² and ω = v/r. Thus the angular momentum of a marble
is L = 0.4mrv. One cannot just add all the momentums and hope for
the best: the units are different. Ultimately one has to retreat to
an energy position noting that the potential energy must appear as
both linear and rotational kinetic energy in both of the marbles
post-collision, along with losses to friction, sound, and any heat
produced in the collision.
The thought
occured as to what to try to reduce the impact of external torque
exerted by the track. One idea was to lubricate the ruler track with some form of
greaseless lubricant such as WD-40®.
WD40 was tried. The first complication is the tape no longer holds the tracks in place.
This problem proved rather insurmountable. In addition, WD40 wound up everywhere -
on hands, table tops, soaked into paper that slid into the WD40. Would need a
greaseless lubricant.
Why not simply use pucks on an air table? Two key reasons. The puck and air table
are unfamiliar to students - this raises the probability that the students will,
in their own minds, see the whole thing as magic. Another mysterious thing in the
modern world. Secondily, the lab should be as reproducible as possible by any teacher
in the nation. Part one requires nothing more than what an instructor on an atoll might
be able to get their hands on.
Marbles on a track are very complex!]
Optional extension: Use ducks of different sizes in part two. Gather data. Plot Pbefore versus Pafter on an xy scattergraph.